💗💭.ws

Cullen v Cullen - Wikipedia Makes A Claim Too Bold To Edit

Wikipedia, on the page List of Twilight characters says:

Alice Cullen [...] ['s] special ability is to see the future, an enhanced version of her ability to have premonitions as a human. Her ability is limited; she is only able to see the outcome of a decision once it is made. Due to this, decisions made in the spur of the moment can not be foreseen.

Alice enjoys playing "Newcomb's paradox-chess" against her telepathic brother Edward.

Now, I recall the Chess thing, but I do not recall Newcomb's paradox being referenced in the Twilight books. A quick googling suggests nobody else recalling this being in the books or movies either, at least not referenced by name.

Here's my take: this is a misunderstanding of Newcomb's paradox. Since chess is zero-sum, there can't be any a-causal coordination between the two players. And since choices and responses can be ordered by [Alice Time] * Omega + [Edward Time], under which all greater numbers mark decisions that can be made while aware of decisions made at any lower number. But since Edward only has finitely many thoughts, you can always reorder this to a strict normal ordering of thoughts and there's nothing acausal at all.

What they mean to say is, she sees the future and he can see her predictions of the future, and her futures incorporate people's current decision-making choices, including strategic responses, and Edward, seeing the same info about the consequences of those decisions, can adjust things. It's confusing, but it isn't related to Newcomb's paradox in any way I can detect.

I think the people editing Twilight-related pages on Wikipedia might be similarly confused, but just don't have the confidence to call the bluff here. Well, here I am. Bluff called.